2023-09-13 10:59:00
The Administrative Court scheduled a hearing on Thanathorn’s lawsuit once morest the Ministry of Interior to revoke Ratchaburi land rights on Sept. 27 following the judge who announced the case recommended the panel dismiss the case. The real reason for investigating the forest People close to him were aware that the land, Ms. 3 Kor., was at risk and might be revoked before selling it to them.
On September 13, 2023, at the Administrative Court, a panel of judges of the Central Administrative Court sat for the first time in the case of Mr. Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit. Chairman of the Progress Committee File a lawsuit once morest the Ministry of Interior, Department of Lands, Director-General of the Department of Lands and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Interior Is the defendant in cases 1-4 requesting to revoke the Land Department’s order No. 747/2022, dated March 29, 2022, revoking the certificate of utilization (N.S. 3 Kor.) No. 158-159, Dan Thap Tako Subdistrict, District. Chom Bueng, Ratchaburi Province
Today, the judge in charge of the case has summarized the issues in the case. and the judge who will present the case will be a judge outside the quorum. Declare personal opinions for consideration by the panel to the parties.
Judge who announces the case Give an opinion that the lawsuit should be dismissed. Because before the Deputy Director-General of the Department of Lands There will be an order to revoke 59 Ms. 3 Kor. documents, including Ms. 3 Kor. Plot No. 158-159 of Mr. Thanathorn. There has been an order to set up a working group to investigate the facts. consisting of related people and experts The inspection is in accordance with academic principles. It was found that the land location according to evidence of NS.3 Kor., all 59 documents, including the disputed land, is in a permanent forest area. Forest on the left bank of the Phachi River According to the Cabinet resolution on February 18, 1969, both plots of disputed land had permanent forest status according to the Cabinet resolution, even before Ms. 3 Kor. No. 158-159 was issued to Mr. Udom. Kitti Udompanich and Mr. Chainarong Busri, who was the original owner of the land in 1978 when both plots of land were located in a permanent forest area. Therefore, it is forbidden to issue a certificate of utilization. Order of the Deputy Director-General of the Land Department revoking the disputed NS.3 Kor. plot. Therefore it is a lawful order.
As for the land officials issuing Ms. 3 Kor. to both plots of land illegally. It will be considered a violation of Mr. Thanathorn. Land buyers who honestly believe that the said land has been legally issued N.S. 3 Kor or not, see that the four defendants in the lawsuit claim to have inspected the land directory N.S. 3 Kor. number. At 159, the attorneys from Mitr Phol Sugarcane Farm Company, the seller, and Mr. Saroj Wasuwanich, the buyer, were informed that The said plot of land is within a national forest reserve. The land in this area may be revoked. Both parties have acknowledged and signed the memorandum dated September 12, 1985, and Mr. Thanathorn did not dispute this information
So it can be heard that Mr. Saroj While purchasing land, Ms. 3 Kor., the disputed plot, from Rai Oi Mitr Phol Company. Already know that The land is in a national forest reserve. Ms. 3 Kor may be revoked. And according to the principle of purchasing a plot of land nearby where Ms. 3 Kor has been issued, a reasonable person knows that there is a chance that the land will be revoked. When Mr. Saroj knew such information but still bought the land. Equal to Mr. Saroj Samajai and accept the risks that may occur yourself The damages incurred are therefore not considered to be the result of the officials’ unlawful actions.
Later, Mr. Saroj Sold land to Mr. Thanathorn Even though the fact did not appear that Mr. Thanathorn knew that the said land, Ms. 3 Kor., might be revoked. But Mr. Saroj works in a management position in the Thai Summit group of companies. of Mr. Thanathorn’s family Normally, the nature of the company’s employees must not be deceitful. Conceal important facts that will cause damage. from the purchase of such land Such facts make it unbelievable. Mr. Thanathorn bought this land in good faith. Therefore, the fact that the Deputy Director-General of the Land Department ordered the revocation of Ms. 3 Kor. of the disputed plot is not considered a violation of Mr. Thanathorn. and government agencies must compensate for damages
After the first hearing, the panel will meet to consider the case. The panel has scheduled an appointment to hear the verdict in this case on September 27 at 10:00 a.m.
1694608099
#Appointment #hear #verdict #September #Thanathorn #sues #Interior #Ministry #revoke #Ratchaburi #land #rights
