2023-08-28 03:15:00
In Neuquén there are five people arrested for the organized robbery that was committed once morest the supermarket of Antártida Argentina and Catriel, on August 20 at 11:30 p.m. A Court of Review examined the situation of each one, and produced modifications.
On Monday the 21st, the five were accused of robbery in a town and in a gang and calamitous, and two of them were placed in pretrial detention, and the rest house arrest, for a period of four months. The public defense requested the review.
In a new hearing, a Court of Review unanimously confirmed the two preventive prisons, and by majority home prisons. But lowered them from four to two months.
The description of the facts varies, depending on the version of the prosecution or the defense.
«Tres Rhodesias»
Public defender Ivana Dal Bianco, who was accompanied by chief defender Laura Giuliani, argued that the five were detained by police. “three blocks from the supermarket”three of them inside a vehicle whose owner is not listed and two on foot.
«In the car they appear, it is not clear how, three Rhodesias, three trays of chicken, a bottle of Gancia and six cans of beer that the prosecution considers stolen from that place. He pointed out that “there are no witnesses” who have seen them in the store, so they might be accused of “covering up” and not theft. In addition, said the lawyer, “it is a trivial fact in terms of affecting the legal interest of the La Anónima supermarket.”
He asked the judges to “they do not apply a political, subjective, fearful, social alarm view”.
“It wasn’t three Rhodesias”
Two legal assistants attended the hearing for the prosecution: Andrés Carrea and Lorena Juárez, who was in charge of substantiating the request to maintain the arrests.
“It was not a robbery of three Rhodesias, it is analyzed how much merchandise was stolen”. «25 co-authors are missing». «The defendants They say they don’t know each other, but we’re looking into it.”. “It was not a simple robbery, It was an extraordinary situation in which 30 people participated»argument.
The Tribunal was made up of Raúl Aufranc, Carolina García and Carina Álvarez. They unanimously confirmed the two preventive ones, and by majority -with the vote of the two judges- the domiciliary ones.
“No one can take advantage of this situation”
“It’s a serious, not insignificant fact,” Aufranc said.
His colleague Álvarez pointed out that “whoever takes advantage of a situation of social unrest to affect the property of another, can hinder the investigation or escape.”
To the defendants “They are not blamed for having caused the social upheavalthat is part of the faults that correspond to and pertain to the Executive Branch»he added. But “no one can take advantage of this situation”.
Finally, a piece of information: the hearing started an hour late, because the Transfer of Detainees division had the address of those who are serving house arrest written down incorrectly. They went to look for them and supposedly they were not there, a serious fault, which might have cost them going to a police station. But it was a bureaucratic mistake.
One of those who has preventive detention lives in Neuquén for six months but another address appears on your ID because it hasn’t changed yet. That was considered “lack of roots”not a bureaucratic error, and was used to substantiate flight risk.
1693204761
#changed #situation #detainees
