2023-08-06 01:28:20
Only 3 confirmed construction errors out of 15 LH Soonsal apartments
‘Embarrassing’ by disclosing the entire list without misclassifying the design
Complete inspection of private apartments is also paid by the construction company
Damage to the image of the builder due to unclear responsibility
Kim Oh-jin, 1st Vice Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport explaining the plan to investigate the private apartment complex (Sejong = Yonhap News) Reporter Kim Joo-hyung = 1st Vice Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Kim Oh-jin is briefing on the plan to investigate the structure of the private apartment complex at the Sejong Government Complex in Sejong City on the followingnoon of the 3rd. 2023.8.3 kjhpress@yna.co.kr
Amid the government’s announcement that it would conduct a full inspection of private apartments that have applied the mulyangpan structure by the end of next month, it is pointed out that it is shifting responsibility only to the construction company, such as bearing costs. In fact, only 3 out of 15 complexes were confirmed as construction errors in the case of missing steel bars in apartments ordered by Korea Land and Housing Corporation (LH), which was the starting point of this incident.
According to the construction industry on the 6th, related associations such as the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the Korea Housing Builders Association, and the Safety Diagnosis Association are continuing discussions ahead of the full investigation of private apartments with no-ryangpan structures. Although the scope or method of the safety diagnosis has not yet been finalized, it is expected that the investigation will begin as soon as the government plans to complete the investigation by the end of September.
Earlier, LH announced that 15 of the ordered apartments were missing rebars. Among them, △Namyangju Byeolnae A25 △Eumseong Geumseok A2 △Yangsan Sasong A2 were found to be construction errors. △Paju Unjeong A34 △New Town RH11 before Chungcheongnam-do Provincial Office △Suseo Station Area A3 △Suwon Dangsu A3 △Osan Segyo 2 A6 △Yangju Hoecheon A15 △Gwangju Seonun 2 A2 △Yangsan Sasong A8 △Paju Unjeong 3 A23 △Incheon Gajeong 2 A1 Reinforcement was missing in the design. In addition, △Gongjuwolsong △Asan Tangjeong 2 had a steel bar missing during construction, but the reason for the defect is still under investigation.
There are also complaints regarding the government’s announcement method. It is necessary to clarify who is responsible and announce the cause sequentially from the time of announcement, such as design and construction. Even though 10 out of 15 sites had steel bars missing due to errors in the design stage, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport did not identify them and disclosed the list of all design, construction, and supervision companies, causing construction companies to be perplexed. An official from the construction company said, “The contractor constructed the 10 sites according to the design, but they are treated as unscrupulous construction companies that skipped the reinforcing bars.” The confusion between the residents and the residents is increasing, and we are in an embarrassing position.” An official from a large construction company said, “Recently, there was a request to check whether some of the construction sites are being supervised well, so we held a briefing session.” By driving it as if it were a problem, it is fueling distrust in the market.” In fact, following the list of insolvent apartment builders was released, the stock prices of related construction companies fell all at once. In the case of mid-sized and small construction companies outside the 30th place in the construction capability evaluation, the blow is greater. This is because not only the immediate stock price has fallen, but it can also lead to avoidance of future orders or sales, which can lead to difficulties in winning new business orders.
It is also burdensome that the construction companies are responsible for the cost of inspecting private apartments that have introduced the non-limiting board. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said in a briefing on the 3rd that the cost of performing safety diagnosis procedures should be borne by the construction company. In the case of large companies, the cost itself is not burdensome, but there are voices of concern regarding blaming the construction company for all inspection and necessary reinforcement costs. An official from the construction industry said, “I wonder why the contractor is paying the supervision fee when the contractor is not the main body of the project.” did.
Unlike LH, which only investigated underground parking lots, they also expressed concern regarding the position of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport to look into the entire residential building. Another official in the construction industry said, “It is difficult to provide samples of houses we already live in, and in order to inspect them, covering (damage to the walls) is inevitable, which increases problems such as restoration costs and housing costs.” I feel like I have become a victim of the LH cartel incident.”
1691286243
#Soonsal #Apartment #builders #fault #Unjust #construction #companies #design #error.. #Seoul #Economic #Daily
