2023-07-18 11:11:00
Received a lawsuit once morest the Election Commission of Thailand for neglect of its duties do not check properties MPs before the election – hurry up on the case of media shares causing “Pita” to be damaged Make an appointment to hear the order on August 8
On July 18, the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct reported that in the case of Mr. Yongyuth Sao Kaewsathit filed a lawsuit once morest Mr. Itthiporn Boonprakong, chairman of the Election Commission (ECT) with a total of 7 people, claiming that the prosecution was the voter. candidate Member of the House of Representatives in constituency division and party-list form, District 8, Bangkok Like voters across the country choosing candidates and advancing parties. It is expected that the Progressive Party will be the leader in forming the government. and got Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat be prime minister The plaintiff is a stakeholder in this case.
Sum it up! For 16 years, ITV, from “free media” to the last “black screen”, was shut down for what reason?
“Ruangkrai” submitted evidence of “Pita” media shares to the Election Commission of Thailand, confirming that in 2023, ITV plans to do media business.
“Going further” warns the Election Commission not to abuse its power beware of people punishing
by suing that between January 31, 2023, and continued until July 13, 2023, all seven defendants committed offenses as state officials. Acting as a government official with dishonest intent MPs, both in constituency divisions and party-list forms, by fraud with the intention of dividing constituencies across the country Election ballot paper design Members of the House of Representatives in constituencies and party lists To be different from many elections in the past Printed more than seven million ballot papers for the number of eligible voters. confuse Including issuing regulations and various announcements in a manner that does everything possible to help the former ruling party win the election and return to government once more.
before, during or following applying for election MPs, both constituencies and party lists The seven defendants are obligated to examine Mr. Phitha’s qualifications. or all candidates that any person is not qualified and/or lacks the qualifications to apply for election as an MP According to the law, but the seven defendants did not follow their authority. Until letting go until the day of the general election This caused Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana to file a complaint accusing Mr. Phitha of Holding 42,000 shares of ITV media, therefore may or may not be qualified to be a candidate for election as a member of the House of Representatives But the defendant did not conduct investigations, investigations and prompt judgments according to law. or not submitting the matter to the Supreme Court for a legal order or judgment
In addition, Mr. Phitha had been an MP for 4 years until the end of his term. There is a further order or judgment according to the law. In the event that Mr. Phitha was complained It is a practice or omission to perform duties wrongfully or dishonestly. causing the other person to be the plaintiff or Mr. Phitha damaged
In addition, the seven defendants are state officials. Corruptly acting as a government official before announcing the results of the election of MPs The seven defendants had many suspicious circumstances. and when the election results It turned out that more than fourteen million voters, including plaintiffs, Choose the Kao Far Party until it has the most number of 151 MPs and aims for the Kao Far Party to be the leader in forming the government and Mr. Pita as Prime Minister.
But the seven defendants were dishonest and with the common intention of persecuting Mr. Phitha. With a meeting to decide, vote, or have a common opinion to submit the matter to Mr. Pita Complained regarding holding shares of ITV media to the Constitutional Court hastily to rule that Mr. Phitha was unqualified and or lack of qualifications to apply for election as MPs because they hold media shares and asked for the revocation of the right to vote In which the seven defendants did not carry out investigations, investigations and thorough judgments first. according to authority or according to any legal process This was done before or during the Prime Minister’s election day on July 13, 2023, in order to reduce Mr. Phitha’s credibility. and the Progressive Party to members of the Sikh Parliament It is a practice or omission to perform duties wrongfully or dishonestly. Causing another person to be the plaintiff and/or Mr. Phitha damaged
The Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct has ordered to accept the case for investigation. And make an appointment to hear orders or judgments on August 8, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.
1689682927
#Criminal #Court #Corruption #Cases #accepts #lawsuit #Election #Commission #Thailand #neglecting #perform #duties #harassing #Pitha #PPTVHD36
