2023-07-04 09:42:53
4/7/2023-|Last update: 4/7/202312:49 PM (Mecca Time)
Twitter users’ angry responses to billionaire site owner Elon Musk continue following the decision to limit the number of tweets users are allowed to read per day.
Tweeters said that Musk’s decision is a prelude to forcing them to subscribe for a fee, amid expectations of campaigns to delete accounts in response to the decision.
Musk had tweeted, saying, “Holders of verified accounts will be able to read 6,000 tweets per day, while the number of unverified accounts is limited to 600 tweets per day.”
Musk raised the number to 10,000 for verified accounts, 1,000 for unverified accounts, and 500 for new accounts, indicating that his decision aims to prevent artificial intelligence companies from exploiting the platform’s data.
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
– Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
– Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
– New unverified accounts to 300/day— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 1, 2023
Twitter is among the most popular social media platforms. According to the data of the current year, the total number of its users exceeds 353 million users, and the number of active users per month reaches 330 million.
The number of Twitter users in the current year decreased by nearly 4% from last year, which followers linked to Musk’s acquisition of the platform.
Abdul Latif Najm, an expert in digital media, explained that Musk, since his acquisition of Twitter, issues decisions that some followers find strange, most notably paying a fee to verify accounts.
He added, in an interview with the evening program on Al-Jazeera Mubasher, that “Mask is, in the end, a businessman looking for profit, while the platform was suffering from problems with that.”
The digital expert believed that Musk’s decision was primarily driven by the profit side, before it was protecting Twitter data from artificial intelligence sites, and that he was trying to push users to buy authentication marks to obtain privileges.
Najm said that the user cannot choose the type of tweets that may appear to him, considering that the matter will affect the accounts of news channels and websites as well, and may limit their access to the user.
He pointed out that Musk had pointed out earlier that “news sites also consume Twitter data” and that he wanted to restore the platform to its social character.
And the digital expert considered that Musk would not declare that his goal is economic, while constantly clarifying that his goal is for the platform to become reliable with its news and by fighting false accounts.
Blogger Pat Lawler published a video clip in which he mocked Elon Musk, indicating that he was unable to control the platform he had purchased, and said that Twitter did not pay certain servers to reduce costs, which caused the blocking of service.
The activist said in the clip that all the competent Twitter programmers left it, and that those who work with him probably do not know where the problem is, which made Musk limit the number of tweets that reach users.
The blogger considered that “incompetence is what drove Musk here,” and mocked the idea that Musk prevents users from using his platform, and went on to say, “Money does not mean intelligence, competence, or success.”
A number of activists participated in the controversy over Musk’s decision, and an account commenting on the blogger Lawler’s video said, “For simplicity, group, in order for Twitter to work normally, it needs, for example, a thousand servers (servers). Suddenly, he found himself working on 100 servers, but he remained without a solution, except that it reduces people’s use.” To the minimum, because the alternative solution was the complete collapse of the platform in front of the mosque of all users, and the servers will gradually return, do not worry.
To simplify, folks, and it is a gross simplification. In order for Twitter to function normally, it needs, for example, a thousand servers. Twitter suddenly found itself running on 100 servers, but it has no solution other than that it reduces people’s use to a minimum, because the alternative solution was the collapse of the entire platform in front of the mosque of all users, and the servers will gradually return. Don’t worry
– Professor Bergl™ (@Islamx) July 2, 2023
Another activist said, “Musk bought Twitter for profit and is now getting his money back.”
Indeed, Elon Musk bought Twitter for 44 billion for the purpose of profit, and he is currently collecting his money
– Without a name (@ saif11112006) July 4, 2023
“It is good that there are options, and our necks are not in the hands of Mr. Elon Musk,” Jassim Salman wrote.
It’s good to have options
Our necks are not in the hands of Mr. Elon Musk– Jassim Salman (@jassimsalman) July 4, 2023
Source: Al-Jazeera Mubasher + social networking sites
1688466129
#Refusing #limit #number #tweets #day.. #revolution #anger #Twitter #owner #Elon #Musk #video #Social #media #news
