During a procedural hearing, the public prosecutor raised the issue of “exception of incompetence”. Consequently, on February 16, the Paris court ruled in favor of the Court of Justice of the Republic having jurisdiction in the case. Gérald Darmanin’s lawyer defended him, saying that the alleged remarks were made in the context of his duties as the Minister of Interior. However, the defense lawyers disagree and are planning to appeal the decision. The trial of Gérald Darmanin accused of defamation once morest Hassan Iquioussen is worth reading. The Moroccan imam’s lawyers filed a lawsuit once morest the Minister for public defamation once morest their client on October 21. In the citation, the lawyers accused the Minister of calling Hassan Iquioussen a “delinquent, separatist, and fugitive” and alleging that he had “things to blame himself for” and “evaded the court decision”.
Following the “exception of incompetence” raised by the public prosecutor during a procedural hearing, on February 16, the Paris court ruled that the Court of Justice of the Republic has jurisdiction in this case. According to Gérald Darmanin’s lawyer, the remarks pursued were made in the context of his duties as Minister of the Interior. Defense lawyers do not hear it that way. They plan to appeal.
To read: Trial of Gérald Darmanin accused of defamation once morest Hassan Iquioussen
On October 21, the Moroccan imam’s lawyers took legal action for public defamation once morest their client. In their citation, they accuse the minister of having described Hassan Iquioussen as a “delinquent, separatist and fugitive”, and of having affirmed that he had “things to blame himself for” and had “evaded the court decision “.
2023-04-15 09:50:00
#court #Paris #decides
