The Moto G53 seeks to bring a new face to the brand’s intermediaries, without losing focus on cost-effectiveness. But to stand out in the market, he needs to beat one of the main competitors. We are talking regarding the Galaxy M23.
In this duel between Samsung and Motorola, which smartphone offers the greatest benefits within this category? We are going to check the answer now, in this Comparative of TudoCelular.
Motorola
03 Mar
Samsung
20 Out
Comparative Index
design and connectivity
Motorola Moto G53
We start with the design with two devices that seek to look like other models of the respective brand. The G53 has revamped the camera block to a more modern form factor that highlights the two larger sensors. The M23 already has the spine that contains the lenses, as well as its more expensive “brothers”.
In any case, both have a plastic body both on the sides and on the back. The Moto gets the upper hand for being more compact and lighter than the Galaxy, but don’t expect any dust and water protection from them.
Samsung Galaxy M23
Motorola also got it right by putting a notch in a hole in the display, more advanced than the drop format used by Samsung. In any case, the biometric reader on them does not change and is integrated into the power button.
Both support storage expansion, but only the Korean has a dedicated microSD card slot. On the connectivity side, you’ll find fifth-generation Wi-Fi and NFC on both sides. Bluetooth in version 5.1 of the Moto G is above the 5.0 present in the rival.
The G53 is more complete and wide in front in the duel.
|
best construction |
None |
|
scratch protection |
None |
|
more modern look |
Moto G53 |
|
Is the slot hybrid or dedicated? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Best notch solution |
Moto G53 |
|
Best biometrics solution |
None |
|
Best endurance certification? |
None |
|
Which is thinner and lighter? |
Moto G53 |
|
Tem NFC? |
Both |
|
Theme Wi-Fi 6? |
None |
|
more advanced bluetooth |
Moto G53 |
multimedia and resources
Bodies
The two phones feature an IPS LCD screen with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. That means you won’t get a high level of brightness or a wide viewing angle, but high fluidity is guaranteed in the system’s animations.
The Galaxy’s display is slightly larger in inches, but the Moto’s is above in front use, thanks to the smaller edges. Too bad none of them contain any additional scratch protection here.
If there’s one thing that ties this issue together, it’s the resolution. The G53 only delivers an HD+, once morest a Full HD+ of the M23, for better image definition.
So the Korean takes the point this time.
|
best screen technology |
None |
|
Best screen brightness |
None |
|
more colors |
None |
|
Best screen resolution |
Galaxy M23 |
|
bigger screen |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Better screen-to-body ratio |
Moto G53 |
|
High Hz screen? |
Both |
|
Does it have scratch protection? |
None |
|
Overall screen quality |
Galaxy M23 |
As
Still in the multimedia part, Motorola has bet on audio in its intermediaries and placed a stereo system in the G53. Unlike Samsung, which preferred to leave only a mono speaker on the M23, which ends up compromising the immersive experience in it.
The result is a far superior sound power from the Moto compared to the Galaxy. But in terms of quality, the duo fails to provide satisfactory quality, because of the unbalanced frequencies. None of them send a headphone in the box, but at least the user will have a physical jack on them, to plug in any compatible accessory.
Stereo sound gives the Moto G the point.
|
Sound is stereo? |
Moto G53 |
|
Does it have P2 input? |
Both |
|
Greater frequency balance |
None |
|
sound power |
None |
|
Do headphones come in the box? |
None |
System
The G53 comes equipped with Android 13 out of the box, once morest the native Android 12 of the M23. Motorola guarantees only one software update, while Samsung must deliver at least three versions of the “little robot”. That is, longevity should be greater on the Korean side, even with a more up-to-date initial system on the rival.
On both sides, the mobile network does not disappoint, as they support 5G. Fluidity shouldn’t be a problem either, as the 120 Hz refresh rate ensures smooth navigation.
Moving on to features, Moto stands out for its Secure Folder, a feature similar to that found on the competitor, in addition to the famous gestures to open the camera and turn on the flashlight. In turn, Galaxy allows you to configure for the camera by double-pressing the power button, in addition to shortcuts on the Edge screen.
Good resources and high fluidity on each side, we give it a draw here.
|
Well-updated system? |
Moto G53 |
|
Will the system be updated in the future? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Which system or customization has more and better features? |
Both |
|
Is there a 5G mobile network? |
Both |
|
More fluid software |
Both |
Performance
Motorola put a Snapdragon 480 Plus mobile platform and 4 GB of RAM in its intermediate, once morest a Snapdragon 750G and 6 GB in Samsung’s. And it seems that this difference in memory had a bigger impact than the different chips. In the second round, Galaxy recorded practically half of Moto’s time, which helped in its total time of 30 seconds less.
The benchmarks also confirm what we saw in our speed tests. Korean comes out on top in both Geekbench and AnTuTu indicators. The games don’t have any big problems. You can run even heavier titles in decent quality.
The M23 was the fastest and takes the point.
|
Who does better on the opening test? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Who wins in the most demanding games? |
None |
|
Who has the best benchmark numbers? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
What is the most up to date processor? |
None |
|
Which has better RAM/CPU balance? |
Moto G53 |
|
Which has more storage? |
None |
Battery
Manufacturers kept the market standard and put a 5,000 mAh battery in their devices. Do the same capacities indicate for similar durations? That’s not what our standardized tests showed. The M23 topped 28 hours, while the G53 stalled at 20 and a half hours.
On reload, we had an inverse scenario, but with little distance between them. Moto was 11 minutes faster than Galaxy. That’s thanks to its 20 W adapter, a little more powerful than the 15 W one that comes in the competitor’s box.
Longer autonomy versus shorter charging time. We give one point for each.
|
Which has more battery? |
None |
|
Which recharges faster? |
Moto G53 |
|
Which lasts longer according to the TC battery test? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Does it have wireless charging? |
None |
Cmera
On one side we found two rear cameras on the Moto, and on the other a triple set on the Galaxy. Both are led by a 50 MP main sensor, which gets the colors, contrast and dynamic range right on them. But Samsung’s software is able to explore better at the level of detail. At night, the duo also manages to take satisfactory pictures, with few grains.
These cell phones also have a macro lens, which lacks low resolution and lack of autofocus. The Korean is the only one to come with an ultrawide camera, which may be far from perfect in terms of sharpness, but it already serves to capture more of the scenarios.
With the most versatile set here, Samsung scores the point this time around.
|
Best rear camera set |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Best photos of the day |
Galaxy M23 |
|
best night photos |
None |
|
most versatile set |
Galaxy M23 |
|
best ultrawide |
Galaxy M23 |
|
best telephoto lens |
None |
|
best macro |
Both |
|
best depth |
None |
Photos taken with the Motorola Moto G53
Only the Galaxy has a camcorder that supports 4K videos, even restricted to 30 fps. Moto is limited to Full HD resolution. Korean also provides electronic stabilization, which helps to deal with shakes. Focus agility will not be a problem in these smartphones, as well as the quality of stereo sound capture.
The definition and stabilization of the M23 give the point for it.
|
Does it have optical stabilization? |
None |
|
Does it have electronic stabilization? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
agile focus |
Both |
|
Does it record 4K at 30 fps? |
Galaxy M23 |
|
Best audio capture |
None |
|
best video quality |
Galaxy M23 |
Photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy M23
The front camera of both has 8 MP resolution. But Samsung makes better use of the sensor and records selfies with greater clarity than Motorola, both during the day and at night. At least, the portrait mode of both does not blow out the background and the front recordings of them are not more than Full HD.
That is, it is one more point for the Korean device.
|
Best front camera set |
None |
|
Front camera records in 4K? |
None |
|
best selfie |
Galaxy M23 |
priests
These devices were officially launched in Brazil. The Moto G53 arrived in the country for a suggested price of R$ 1,900, a little cheaper than the R$ 2,000 initially charged for the Galaxy M23. In the current market, the Korean can be found in the range of R$ 1,300, slightly below the almost R$ 1,600 requested by Motorola’s rival.
Thus, Samsung closes the Comparison with the last point.
|
Which had the best launch price in Brazil? |
Moto G53 |
|
Which has the lowest current cost? |
Galaxy M23 |
Motorola Moto G53
Compare
Samsung Galaxy M23
Compare
Done
In this clash between Motorola and Samsung, the G53 had some important points in its favor. We are talking regarding its more modern design, its stereo sound system and its faster recharge, even if the competitor’s battery lasts much longer away from the socket.
In addition to superior autonomy, the M23 still has the screen with the best resolution, the fastest performance and the camera set that delivers superior results in rear photos, videos and selfies.
And to consolidate Galaxy’s victory in this confrontation, it is also the cell phone that can be found at a lower price in national retail. Thus, you will have more benefits overall and still be able to pay less for it.
RESULT
Motorola Moto G53: 4 POINTS
- More modern, compact and lightweight design
- stereo sound
- Up-to-date system with good features
- Battery with less recharge time
Samsung Galaxy M23: 8 POINTS
- screen with better resolution
- System with greater longevity and good features
- Faster performance
- Battery with greater autonomy
- Rear cameras with higher photo quality and ultrawide sensor
- Videos in 4K and with stabilization
- Front camera with sharper selfies
- Lowest price in the current Brazilian market
Do you find the benefits of the G53 more interesting than those of the M23? Which one would you rather buy, if you had to choose? Respond in the space below.
(updated March 13, 2023 at 21:02)
