The new consultation rates proposed by Health Insurance were rejected “unanimously” by the two main unions in the sector.
MI with AFP
© QUENTIN DE GROEVE / Hans Lucas / Hans Lucas via AFP
Published on
Subscriber-only audio playback
DSunday, February 26 in the evening, MG France and Avenir Spé-Le Bloc, the two main unions of liberal doctors, among general practitioners and specialists, indicated that they had “unanimously” rejected the new consultation rates proposed by the Health insurance in return for a commitment to increase their activity. The six representative doctors’ unions have until Tuesday, February 28 to vote for or once morest the new consultation fee schedule proposed by Health Insurance.
“There was 98% participation and 100% said no to signing. A unanimous negative vote “which” must be such as to make politicians think regarding it, “said Agnès Giannotti, president of MG France, the largest general practitioners’ union, during a press conference. Same result among specialists from the Avenir Spé-Le Bloc union, meeting in a general meeting on Sunday: “No signature, unanimously”, told AFP the president of Avenir Spé, Patrick Gasser. “We did what we might, it’s a failure,” he added, but “the responsibility lies with others, in government and above.”
” Lack of recognition “
The proposal of the Cnam (National Health Insurance Fund) provides that all medical consultations would be revalued by 1.50 euro. For general practitioners, this unconditional revaluation would bring the basic consultation to 26.50 euros, once morest 25 euros since 2017. Practitioners agreeing to make “territorial commitments” (taking more patients, participating in on-call duty, practicing in a medical desert …) would obtain a higher consultation rate, at 30 euros for example for general practitioners.
But among general practitioners, this question of the tariff was “marginal” in the outcome of the vote, assured Ms. Giannotti, explaining that practitioners mainly suffer from a “lack of recognition”. “To say that we have to get involved means that we don’t do it and that is absolutely inaudible for the profession,” she added.
READ ALSOFrench doctors in the midst of an existential crisis
“Ineligible” counterparties
For the specialists, the counterparties required were simply “not admissible”, explained Mr. Gasser, comparing the overall envelope of 1.5 billion euros advanced by the Cnam to the “billions injected into health establishments, public and private” since the Covid and the “Ségur de la santé”.
READ ALSODemorand – Why the French health system is doing so badly
With this rejection of the two organizations weighing more than 30% each among generalists and specialists, the draft agreement supported by the government is regarding to fall through. Failing an unlikely alliance between at least two of the four remaining unions, the new tariffs will be set by an “arbitrator” – in this case, a senior official appointed by the executive.
The Ministry of Health has planned to speak on the subject during a telephone briefing with journalists on Monday mid-morning.
READ ALSOPrice of consultations: lying poker between doctors and health insurance
