The Court of Appeal ordered 8 years in prison for “Nam Nam”, drunk on “Lanlabelle”, a pretty girl who died. As for the house owner, the party and the three people were charged with supporting each other, imprisonment for 5 years and 4 months, and jointly paying 7.4 hundred thousand baht, while the other 2 people dismissed the charge.
At 10:00 a.m. on January 17, 2023 at the Thonburi Criminal Court, Ekachai Road, the court made an appointment to read the verdict on the case of Pretty Lullabell, death, black number Or. Ms. Thitima or Lullabell, the deceased co-plaintiff filed a lawsuit once morest Mr. Rachdej or Nam Nam Wongtabutr, 27 years old, pretty boy. Domiciled Ekachai-Bangbon, Bangkok, Defendant No. 1, Mr. Chaiyaphon or Kew Phanna, age 30, Domiciled in Bang Bua Thong Province, Nonthaburi, Party owner Ban Bang Bua Thong, Defendant 2, Mr. Natee or Tee Satitpongsathaporn, age 34, Domiciled in Lat Phrao, Bangkok. 3rd Defendant, Ms. Pikunthong or First Boonpha, 25 years old, Q’s girlfriend, Nong Han Province, Udon Thani Province 4th Defendant, Mr. Kritsada or Nobi Blooddee, 28 years old, Domiciled in Udon Thani Province, 5th Defendant and Mr. Koset or Ping Pong Ritnithiroek, 36 years old, domiciled in Bang Bua Thong, Nonthaburi Province, the 6th defendant in the offense of being a thieves’ brothel, taking others to indecency by using violent force. Using unethical dominance or coercion in any way, committing an indecent act on a person over 15 years of age by using violent force In which the person is in a state that cannot resist, imprisoned and imprisoned others or act in any way depriving others of body liberty and causes death to the detainee, imprisonment or deprivation of the liberty of that body. according to the Criminal Code Sections 210, 213, 278, 284, 310 in conjunction with Sections 83, 91
The deceased mother filed a request for all six defendants. jointly pay compensation
In which the plaintiff stated the wrongful act, concluded that on September 16, 2019, the 6 defendants conspired from 5 or more people, knowingly and agreeing to have a party by drinking alcohol (party) at home. No. 100/199, Pruksa Village 3, Rim Klong 3, Moo 5, Bang Khu Rat Sub-district, Bang Bua Thong District, Nonthaburi Province and hired Ms. Thitima or Lallabelle Noraphanphiphat, 26 years old, the deceased to be a guardian. Ritty brews liquor, joins the dance and joins in the drinking. All six defendants intended to make Ms. Thitima drink alcohol until she was drunk. And in a state where he might not resist, Mr. Ratchadej, the 1st defendant, took Pretty Lullabell which at that time had a very high level of alcohol in the blood, was in a state of intoxication By using an indecent force of violence by rubbing your face with your hands, hugging your torso, chest area and carrying it out of the aforementioned house to get into the 1st defendant’s car and take him to a condo room in the Dao Khanong area, Dao Khanong Subdistrict, Thonburi District, Bangkok. Then the 1st defendant took him up to the room. In which Pretty Lullabell is in a state that cannot resist resulting in detention and imprisonment deprived of liberty of body and death
As for the 2nd-6th defendants, they jointly supported the offense of the 1st defendant by jointly organizing a drinking party. Turn on the musical instruments, set up the party lights. To have an atmosphere like a service place at the said villa, where Mr. Chaiyaphon, the 2nd defendant, was the owner of the villa. While the 2-6 defendants were participants in the event, they knew the purpose of organizing the party. By letting Pretty Lulabelle drink alcohol until she was drunk. unable to maintain consciousness and in a state of inability to resist Then the defendants agreed to allow Mr. Ratchadej, the 1st defendant, to take Pretty Lullabell to do indecent acts without obstructing or discouraging them as helping. Or facilitate the fact that Mr. Ratchadej, the 1st defendant, commits an offence.
All six defendants denied.
In this case, Salaya Thonburi saw that the 1st defendant continued to act in connection with the same agenda. with intent to commit indecent acts and sexually abuse the deceased It is therefore a single action offense once morest several chapters of the law. Therefore, punishment for detention and confinement of others causes the death of the detainee. which is the most severe punishment, up to 8 years imprisonment
Defendants 2-6 are supporters of Mr. Rachdej or Nam Nam Nam, the 1st defendant committing such an offense, imprisonment for 5 years and 4 months each and for all six defendants to jointly pay compensation to the deceased mother, the co-plaintiff in the amount of 748,660 baht as well.
All defendants filed an appeal.
Today, all defendants came to court.
The Court of Appeal reviewed the record of the consultation meeting. It was seen that the actions of defendants 1-4 were true offenses according to the lawsuit. The appeal of the 1-4 defendants might not be heard, while the 5-6 appeal of the defendants claimed that they had no knowledge of the matter.
The Court of Appeal therefore reversed the punishment. Defendants 1-4 imprisoned according to the verdict of the Court of First Instance, while the 5-6 defendants dismissed the charges.
