ECJ judgment expected: When the pandemic spoiled the holiday

Status: 01/12/2023 06:46 a.m

Many were surprised by the pandemic in the middle of their vacation and had to accept corona restrictions on site. Does the full travel price still have to be paid? The ECJ will now clarify this.

By Celine Zeck and Claudia Kornmeier, ARD legal department

March 2020: The corona virus has arrived in Europe, the EU countries are trying to take drastic measures to contain the spread. Also on the holiday island of Gran Canaria. A curfew is imposed here. Tourists are no longer allowed on the beach. Hotels close their pools, block off lobby areas. Vacationers are only allowed to leave their rooms to eat.

Right in the middle a married couple from Germany. It had booked a package tour to the Canary Island from mid to late March 2020 – i.e. starting the trip at a time when Corona was already an issue, but there were still no legal restrictions in everyday life in Europe. But that changed the day following arriving on site.

“No vacation, just stress”

You should have stayed in your room and only made calls, says the plaintiff. A local travel SOS hotline asked holidaymakers to be ready at all times for a possible return journey so that they might be at the airport within an hour.

“It was absolutely no vacation, just stress,” says the plaintiff. Of the two weeks booked on Gran Canaria, he and his wife only spent one week on site, mostly in their hotel room, until they were able to leave early.

That’s why they now want part of their money back from the tour operator. They only want to pay 30 percent of the travel price. But the organizers refuse. In court, he argues that he is not responsible for the Spanish government’s corona measures. It was regarding the realization of a general life risk for which he was not responsible.

Claim under the EU Travel Directive

The case is now before the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). Because according to the EU Package Travel Directive, travelers are entitled to a reduction in the travel price if the package travel is not fulfilled in accordance with the contract.

The ECJ must therefore now clarify whether the corona measures on Gran Canaria were in breach of contract – although similar restrictions also applied to the plaintiffs’ home town at the same time. The verdict is to be announced in the course of tomorrow morning.

Money back for cancellations?

It is not the first time that a court has had to deal with the rights of travelers during the pandemic. The constellations are different. In many cases, consumers did not even start the trip, but canceled it because of the pandemic.

When holidaymakers cancel a package tour, tour operators usually charge cancellation fees. Free cancellation is only possible in exceptional cases: if “extraordinary circumstances” occur at or near the destination that “significantly affect” the package tour.

BGH: Pandemic “extraordinary circumstance”

Last summer, the Federal Court of Justice ruled on the case of a senior citizen who had booked a Danube cruise for the end of June in January 2020. At the beginning of June, she canceled the trip on the advice of her family doctor because she had often had problems with pneumonia. From the point of view of the Federal Court of Justice, she does not have to pay the travel price, even though the cruise took place with an adapted hygiene concept.

Because the corona pandemic is an “extraordinary circumstance” that can significantly affect a package tour. From the point of view of the judges in Karlsruhe, the fact that the pandemic prevailed worldwide – and not just at the travel destination – does not change this assessment.

In the specific case, the woman’s health was unreasonably endangered. The spatial conditions on board a river cruise ship played a role in this assessment, but also the fact that there was no vaccination option in June 2020 and no therapies once morest Covid-19 either. In addition, the over 80-year-old was part of a risk group because of her age and previous illness.

Another constellation lies with the ECJ. The question is to what extent circumstances that occurred later – such as a travel warning – must be taken into account for a free cancellation.

Leave a Replay