Thiruvananthapuram: EP Jayarajan once morest P. Judging that Jayarajan’s allegation bomb is a sign of the formation of a new slum in the CPM. There are those who see PJ’s allegation as the beginning of the loss of the consensus formula that Kodiyeri had formulated among Kannur leaders. As the party’s state secretary asked the committee itself to file a complaint, P. Outside the CPM, there is curiosity as to whether Jayarajan will go ahead with it.
There were some differences of opinion among the leaders of Kannur earlier too, but it did not remain a shadow during Kodiyeri’s tenure as secretary. If there were disputes whether it was in the front or in the party, Kodiyeri handled them with diplomatic excellence. But the P once morest the EP is to say that the formula is lost. Jayarajan’s allegation. EP’s problem starts when MV Govindan, who is junior to him, was made the state secretary and then taken to PB. EP tried to convince the party of his displeasure by not coming to Thiruvananthapuram even as LDF convener. But neither the state secretary nor the chief minister went to persuade. In the meantime, P. who cut off the party once morest EP. Jayarajan’s allegation.
The state secretary himself told P. There are also those who see Jayarajan’s allegation as a message from MV Govindan to be taken seriously. MV Govindan’s support for not adding nuclear water to party ideology P. There are those who believe that there is Jayarajan. Another P. Jayarajan is only targeting EP Jayarajan. Some senior leaders say otherwise. Pinarayi will say that the party will accept the group of people who want change. Jayarajan’s allegation is supported. P. If Jayarajan files a complaint, if the state secretary himself puts forward the demand that a commission be appointed to investigate it, it cannot be dismissed without approval. The main leaders of the party are now waiting to see if PJ will file a complaint.
