As reported by La Tercera, the highest court would have unanimously decided to annul the trial, The defense accused being the object of violation of constitutional rights and that the court that tried him was impartial.
Last August, Martin Pradenas He was sentenced to 20 years in prison following being declared culpable from repeated crimes of sexual abuse and rape.
Agency One – Martín Pradenas, archive
Read Also >
Supreme Court sets decision date for annulment appeal in the Pradenas Case
However, later the defense of Pradenas presented an appeal for annulment, which was declared admissible by the Oral Criminal Court of Temuco.
the supreme court set for December 29 the reading of the judgment of said appeal for annulment, however, according to Thirdthe criminal chamber of the highest court would have resolved -in a unanimous ruling- to annul the trial where the defendant was sentenced to 20 years in prisonl, to order one new process with non-qualified judges.
The aforementioned medium points out that -following a series of suspensions- The highest court heard the arguments of the defense, who accuse that Pradenas was the object of violation of constitutional rights and that the court that tried him was impartial.
“As of the dictation of the verdict in the present case, The magistrate has shared through his public social networks a series of messages from other users of the Instagram social network, which use expressions and qualifiers that violate the dignity of our client, such as “rapist” or “damn rapist”.“, points out the libel of the defense.
They also detail that the same magistrate would have spread images and messages that “include the hashtag #JusticiaparaAntoniaexpression that has been used in social networks by those who from the beginning of this judicial process, and even before the formalization of the investigation once morest our client, have disseminated and supported the victim “.
