World Cup | In Qatar, a new era for refereeing: more playing time… and leniency

They still found themselves at the center of many debates. And it’s not for lack of doing their job differently. From an inaugural match between Ecuador and Qatar where the invalidation – however justified – of a goal caused misunderstandingin a final where Szymon Marciniak’s performance tensed, World Cup referees implemented FIFA’s brand new policy for the conduct of the game.

It was therefore quickly highlighted, with the first semi-automated detection of offside which led to the cancellation of an Ecuadorian goal, during the first match once morest Qatar, when no one had detected, on the terrain, Estrada’s illicit position. The other great novelty of refereeing also showed up during this first meeting but it became very evident the next day, during England – Iran, where no less than 26 minutes of additional time were added. over the whole game.

world Cup

Crowded streets, blocked bus: Argentine footballers forced to fly over the crowd in a helicopter

10 HOURS AGO

This trend, particularly marked during the first day of the group stage, dried up somewhat therefollowing before normalizing around the six or seven minutes added at the end of the match during the knockout matches. It corresponds to FIFA’s desire to increase effective playing time, which has been steadily reduced in club competitions in recent years. Pierluigi Collina, head of the referees committee of the highest body in world football, made the intention public.

A few more warnings… but a lot fewer faults

This desire to bring the action closer to the 60 minutes of actual play also pushed the officials to be much more lenient towards the players. Even if the referees handed out more yellow cards than in 2018 (227 in Qatar once morest 219 in Russia), they also and above all blew the whistle much less: 1,548 fouls were signaled over the whole of the competition, the equivalent to around 24 per game (24.2 precisely). This is significantly less than four years ago (1734 fouls, 27.1 per game).

“It’s the greatest final in history”

Some teams, playing much more aggressively, took advantage of this more lenient refereeing. This is the case of Morocco, the team having committed the most faults (92) during the tournament, but having received only seven warnings in all. Argentina, world champion, can’t complain either, since the Albiceleste players caused 91 whistles (11 more than Croatia, all the same, and 26 more than France) but completed the competition without the slightest exclusion. Which, given the behavior of some Argentinian players, including in the final, still looks like a small feat.
Lionel Scaloni’s men even survived their confrontation once morest the Netherlands in the quarterfinals, second most sanctioned meeting in the history of the World Cup (behind Portugal – Netherlands 2006) with 17 cards but one exclusion. Proof that you really had to want it to see red, since only four men had to leave the lawn before their teammates.

Another lack of consistency around penalties

It may therefore be necessary to award a prize to Wayne Hennessey, goalkeeper of Wales, the only player to have received a direct red card (and following consulting the VAR!) for his kamikaze outing once morest Iran. And say “good game” to England, who came home with only one warning (Maguire) in all. Paradoxically, this leniency did not really have an impact on the number of penalties awarded.

Why did Mbappé score 10?

A total of 23 penalty kicks, including five for Argentina alone, were taken. It’s less than in 2018 but it’s as much as in 1998 and more than in all the other editions. This is always linked to the presence of VAR, of course, but also to the lack of homogeneity around certain frequent faults in the area, such as hands or shirt pulling.

The meeting between England and Iran perfectly illustrated these inconsistencies, since Taremi obtained a penalty for a clash much less obvious than that suffered by Maguire at the very start of the match. But among the strangest refereeing facts, we will most certainly remember the cancellation of Antoine Griezmann’s goal once morest Tunisia following the final whistle. Which was, fortunately, without consequence for the rest of the epic of the Blues.

world Cup

Mbappé at half-time in the final: “It’s the match of a lifetime guys!”

13 HOURS AGO

world Cup

Govou: ‘It’s impossible to recover from a loss in the World Cup final’

20 HOURS AGO

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.