In new developments The case of the Egyptian artist, Mohamed Ramadan, once morest his fellow journalist, Amr Adib; The October Appellate Misdemeanor Court acquitted the latter of insulting and slandering controversial actorThrough his program “The Story” broadcast on “MBC Egypt”.
This came, following a lawsuit filed by Muhammad Ramadan once morest Amr Adib, who held the famous actor in his program directly responsible for the death of the pilot, Ashraf Abu Al-Yusr, following he caused him to be suspended from work for life, because of a picture in the cockpit that collected Ramadan with the pilot.
A copy of Amr Adib’s innocence ruling in the case of insulting and slandering Muhammad Ramadan
Untrue talk
In this regard, Amr Adeeb’s lawyer, Tariq Jamil Saeed, indicated that Ramadan’s lawyer mentioned during a television program that his client, Amr Adeeb. An accused and a fine of 10,000 poundsAnd therefore, many sites circulated this unfounded talk, and it is true that Ramadan was the one once morest whom the verdict was issued, and his lawyer submitted an appeal once morest him, and the next December 20 will be determined for the verdict to be pronounced, according to what was reported by ET in Arabic.
The court ruling stated that the phrases and expressions mentioned by the plaintiff for the civil right in his statement of claim, which were mentioned by the accused, did not satisfy the intention of the accused to insult or slander the plaintiff with the civil right.
A copy of Amr Adib’s innocence ruling in the case of insulting and slandering Muhammad Ramadan
And the court continued: “The accused considers his entitlement to sue the plaintiff for the civil right as established by the expressions, and it did not contain direct and explicit slander or insult from the accused once morest the plaintiff of the civil right, which is negated with him.” While ruling the conviction of the accused, and ruling once more the innocence of the accused of what was assigned to him pursuant to Article 1/304 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and as the court ruled in his presence to accept the appeal in form and in the subject by canceling the appealed ruling and judging once more the innocence of the accused of what was assigned to him.
A copy of Amr Adib’s innocence ruling in the case of insulting and slandering Muhammad Ramadan
It is noteworthy that the controversial star’s lawyer had filed a lawsuit once morest the media, Amr Adib, on charges of defamation, threatening, insulting, slander, and abuse of influence, demanding financial compensation of 100,000 pounds.
The journalist also submitted previous reports once morest the artist, Mohamed Ramadan, on charges of bickering and insults that were made by Ramadan and mocking him in videos on his page on the communication sites.
