Updated on 09/17/2022 at 08:36
- The legal battle between Donald Trump and the US Department of Justice continues.
- After the ex-president’s house was searched, a special representative should now examine the documents confiscated.
- But the Ministry fears that this will paralyze the investigation and is taking action once morest the decision.
After the appointment of a neutral examiner in the case of the confiscated documents from the ex-president Donald Trump the US Department of Justice is taking action once morest parts of the decision.
The ministry applied to an appeals court on Friday evening (local time) for permission to continue viewing the documents while the special counsel is reviewing them.
The government and the public would suffer irreparable harm if access to the documents were delayed, the motion said. The decision hampered the investigation and the government’s efforts to protect the security of the nation.
Justice Department loses access to documents by special agent
A judge appointed a neutral expert to examine the confiscated documents on Thursday. Trump and his lawyers repeatedly criticize the actions of the judiciary as politically motivated. Therefore, they demanded the appointment of the neutral auditor and filed a corresponding lawsuit.
This was approved. The special representative now has until the end of November to examine the documents. Until then, the Justice Department no longer has proper access to them – it is taking action once morest them. The examiner, the New York lawyer Raymond Dearie, has called a first meeting with Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department for next Tuesday.
In early August, the FBI searched Trump’s Florida mansion. The FBI confiscated various classified documents, some with the highest level of secrecy.
According to the law, this material should have been given to the National Archives. Since Trump kept the records at his private estate following his term in office, he may have broken the law. This is now being investigated.
Trump’s team is said to have misled the National Archives
The Justice Department had complained that the appointment of the special representative would delay the investigation. The appeal once morest Thursday’s decision was expected.
The ministry now argues that further inspection of the documents by the authorities would not hinder the work of the neutral examiner. “The court order paralyzes this investigation,” the motion said. The ban must be lifted immediately so that the investigation can be resumed.
Meanwhile, more and more details regarding the case surrounding the confiscated documents are becoming known. The Washington Post reported that Trump’s team misled the National Archives regarding the missing documents.
The National Archive is said to have been informed in a conversation in September 2021 that the documents were only newspaper clippings, the newspaper wrote, citing people who were not named.
A former Trump adviser is said to have referred to information from former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the phone call with a lawyer from the National Archives.
According to the Washington Post, both Meadows and the former adviser declined to comment. At the time, the National Archives contacted Trump and his team regarding missing documents. (dpa/thp)
Updated on 09/16/2022, 15:00
In a speech to members of the Bundeswehr, Chancellor Scholz hinted at a change in the export rules for military goods. In addition, the core task of the Bundeswehr – the defense of the country and the alliance – should come back into focus.
