The Israeli may accept the loss or stumbling of his projects in the East or the West, but his main constant at this stage remains Syria, given the results of the war on Syria, especially with the completion of the Iranian cordon around its already bleeding neck in Gaza and Lebanon.
-
The Israeli followed the tripartite summit in Tehran with great concern, so that this concern was quickly translated.
The Israeli followed the tripartite summit in Tehran with great concern, to quickly translate this concern with a missile attack on the vicinity of Damascus, which led to the death of three Syrian soldiers, confirming that the goal was not a reflection of field intelligence follow-up in the face of the terrifying Iranian positioning, and its roots extend every day, but rather a political and security message once morest the parties The three summit is in the heart of the constant enemy of Israel; Syria.
That the Iranians succeed in hosting Putin, in his first travel outside Russia since the Russian military operation in Ukraine, with Erdogan, the regional and international player in the Ukraine field, as in the expansion of “NATO” in Europe, in light of the radical contradictions in the Syrian field, means that the Hebrew entity A geo-strategic shift, especially following the modest results of the Biden summit in Jeddah, with the continuing US-Israeli dispute over the nuclear agreement to be revived with Iran.
The summit of interests in Tehran seemed to the Israeli to be close to banning its political principles, which means the possibility of the Turkish and the Russian getting close to swimming in the space of Iranian principles, even partially, especially through the Syrian gap, which raises the Israeli appetite and anxiety in all its transformations, so he took the initiative to invest in the policy of “Syrian Sky” The open” before it turned into “informed vessels,” according to what the Hebrew newspaper Haaretz expressed. Was this Israeli aggression, in the vicinity of Damascus, at dawn on Friday, a political response or a message smeared with blood, or perhaps it felt the pulse of a level that changed following the two summits in Tehran and Jeddah?
The Tehran summit came at a political date full of Israeli regional and international contradictions, as it is in an unprecedented normalization with Turkey, in light of the Turkish craving for Mediterranean gas through the Israeli window as an American condition. He “sided” with his enthusiastic east, though to explore the path through the Iranian opportunity, in light of the priority of the conflict with the Kurds in Syria and Iraq, which is a permanent internal priority, but today it is more acute with the Israeli; Given the particularity of his pivotal role in exploiting Kurdish squares once morest his archenemy Iran, at the same time, the Turkish calculations inside Syria strongly conflict with the Iranian-Russian keenness to clean Syria from every intruder who treads on it without official Syrian permission.
The Israeli discontent with the Tehran summit seems justified, given its nature, as it includes three eastern powers that are active in determining the fate of the region, and it succeeded in tampering with some of the modest effects of the Jeddah summit, even if it pushed normalization with Saudi Arabia a step forward, but it is not sufficient for the Israeli aspiring to form an Arab NATO. A full-fledged Israeli, in light of the American and Saudi wait, due to the priority of the war in Ukraine, the United States, under the urgency of pumping more Saudi oil before the next European winter, without sufficient Russian gas, with the price hike remaining unchanged, which made the Israeli feel the decline in the priority of his impulses in US accounts.
It is natural for the Israeli concern to exacerbate, as this summit came, and the Russian began to adjust its balance with the Israeli, whether at the United Nations, or in suspending the activities of the Jewish Agency in Russia, and its quest to permanently dissolve it, with its mounting statements regarding the losses of Israeli mercenaries in the battles of Ukraine, which is This coincided with the final Israeli exit from the equation of arresting the middle of the stick, with Lapid taking over the presidency of the entity’s government, and he is a liberal Zionist who strongly supports American policy in Europe.
The escalation of field tension on the Iraqi-Turkish border appears to be a reflection or emptying of the Turkish-Iranian-Russian contradictions outside the Syrian arena. To the American seizing most of his keys, which would make mitigating the contradiction in Syria more beneficial for everyone, especially for the Russian side.
What did the Israeli gain from the Jeddah summit? And what did he lose from the Tehran summit?
This is the question that casts a shadow over the Hebrew media, and worries an aspiring Hebrew prime minister who, following the Tehran summit, finds himself in front of a newcomer that requires it to be bypassed, or to extinguish its glare, to crawl through normalization with Riyadh and Rabat in the expansion of East Asia and North Africa, in a way that surrounds every counter ambition, The non-Israeli does not remain roaming and investing in the “post-Arab Spring” world, even in light of the echoes of the war in Europe.
The Israeli may accept the loss or stumbling of his projects in the East or the West, but his basic constant at this stage is; Syria remains, given the results of the war on Syria, especially with the near completion of the Iranian cordon around its already bleeding neck in Gaza and Lebanon, due to the intractability they are not accustomed to, so how can it get used to a newcomer in Syria? Therefore, it takes the initiative to target it, while in this aggression it is examining the extent of its loss from the Tehran summit, or seeking to reduce the size of this loss.
Whether this renewed aggression once morest Damascus was a response or a feeling of the pulse, the parties to the summit in Tehran, especially the Iranians, may have understood the priority of the Israeli rush, which, on the other hand, places in their priorities the need to close the gate of the open Syrian sky, so that the pots can be knocked down in the wind. Damascus has to suffer every dawn, while the nights of Tel Aviv enjoy the breezes of the Jaffa Sea, and it has been suffocating for a long time.
