Far from lowering the tone of the discussion on the plans and social movementsa debate that was installed on the political agenda following the speech of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner in the plenary of the CTAthe Minister of Development of the Buenos Aires Community, Andres “Crow” Larroque crossed the leaders of the Avoid Movement whom he accused of having “a promiscuous link” with the Government of Mauricio Macri.
In communication with AM750the leader of The Campora accused Aemilius Persian: He said that he was the one who contributed the most to putting tension between Alberto and Cristina “permanently operating” and that the leaders of Evita have a position “permanently opposed” to the vice president.
“Chinese Navarro and Persian always play hide and seek. They wanted to put tension between Cristina and Scioli, they played with Randazzo and now they want to break up the Frente de Todos”, manifested.
Regarding the plans, Larroque denounced that the Evita Movement wants to dispute power within the Government “with the humble as hostages” and pointed out that the main problem is that currently the election of those who have access to the right to social programs is not in the hands of the State but in the hands of the organizations that “are managed with discretion.”
“Some think that by having more social plans they have more power. There are reports that a percentage of the plans is taken from the beneficiaries. That is reprehensible”, expressed Larroque.
“It amuses me that Pérsico and Chino Navarro say that Cristina is liberal when they They had a promiscuous link with the government of Mauricio Macri and co-governed with Carolina Stanley. Today we see a continuity of Stanley’s policies because this scheme of plans has nothing to do with the historical spirit of Peronism, he added.
Darts once morest Martín Guzmán
Then Larroque pointed once more contra Economy Minister Martin Guzman, whom he accused of “agreeing on an adjustment” with social organizations. The leader of La Cámpora assured that this was seen, above all, with the “magical disappearance” of the program of Emergency Family Income (IFE), an “interesting and successful policy”, to move on to the plans of Boost Workwho have a “questionable implementation”.
“Guzmán’s policies explain, in economic terms, they explain the electoral defeat. He told us that in 2021 we were going to have 30 inflation points and we already saw how we ended up”, he expressed.
