The Constitution Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and Deputies will analyze this Monday, April 11, the project that seeks a qone withdrawal from the pension funds, legislation where there are still doubts regarding who will support the initiative.
Of the 13 members of the instance, four said they were in favor, four once morest and five in reflection, increasing doubts regarding the future that it will have.
The organization will meet during this day to describe the scope of the idea, which consisted of the merger of the seven projects presented by various representatives of the Low camera.
When do you vote for it? The member deputies will vote this Tuesday, April 12, on the idea, where if it is rejected, it will be sent to the Chamber of the Chamber with a negative report. It is worth mentioning that in the plenary session of the National Congress it requires 93 votes to continue advancing.
For its part, if the Commission approves the project, the processing will begin in particular.
The Minister of Finance, Mario Marcel, reiterated this weekend that, in the event that the project continues to advance, “The economy is going to be weaker. There will be more inflation and a more stressed financial sector.”
“All this makes it difficult to execute the government program,” he said.
THE DEBATE IN MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION
Marcos Ilabaca (PS) he stressed that “the conditions of the families have not changed, that is why I will support the fifth retreat. I think it is a necessary urgency.”
In addition, Miguel Angel Callisto (DC) he emphasized that “we want to advance in a retirement project, but in parallel to a pension reform”.
Pamela Jiles (PH) He stated that “the deputies will have to choose between turning their backs on the people and being in favor of the AFPs or listening to you (citizens)”.
Equally, Jorge Alessandri (UDI) He maintained that “the center-right is divided around the project. The vote is up and the decision is up to the parliamentarians of Approve Dignidad.”
Unlike, Gustavo Benavente (UDI) He stressed that a new withdrawal “would not be good for people, especially for the most vulnerable.”
Finally, Catalina Perez (RD) He ruled that “if approved, 50% of people would be left without savings. This is not a problem with the AFPs, but one to end them and create a social justice system.”