Piyabutr said he should not be happy that Parena was deprived of political rights. Because the Constitution of the year 60

“Piyabutr” advises not to be happy, “Pareena” has been deprived of political rights, reiterating that the 60’s constitution has problems

On April 7th, Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, the leader of the progressive group Former MP and secretary-general of the Future Forward Party Write a message on Twitter, expressing academic opinions once morest the 2017 Constitution, the issue of disqualification of political rights, stating:

The 2017 Constitution provides for serious ethical violations by politicians to the Supreme Court and carries the political death penalty. is not correct 1. Ethical standards are ethical matters. Code of conduct is an internal matter in the organization. Must let each organization determine and decide for themselves. Other agencies He did it himself and punished himself.

2. Ethical standards are not legal criteria. It’s not right or illegal. But it’s a matter of suitability. Therefore, the court should not decide or punish the court, for example, the relevant court can review it, for example, civil servants are subject to disciplinary action. may sue the court to revoke the punishment order It is to check whether the punishment order is lawful or not.

But in the case of politicians, the ethical standards at the Constitutional Court And independent organizations come out to apply and also let the NACC come to point out the information and send it to the Supreme Court for a decision. 3. High penalty, the disqualification of candidates for life should not be there. This is a severe destruction of fundamental rights. political execution

“The 2017 constitution applies to two cases: imprisonment for corruption. and serious ethical violations which the traveler took to advertise that this was “Constitution to Suppress Cheating”, but actually cheating still exists and increases, and this channel is for attacking politicians.”

“I therefore do not agree with the Supreme Court’s judgment of Ms. Parena. and suggested that we should not be happy with this kind of matter. On the contrary, we should campaign to point out the dangers of the Constitution and fight once morest “Niti Songkhram”.”

Leave a Replay