EDITO – Recently, a translation of the space in which we operate has taken place.
In this dialectical vergence that we call “metaverse”, fake is the new real. The truth no longer has to be a judgment that conforms to its object, the object must conform to the truth. In this paradigm at the mercy of power, according to its needs, it is transformed and reformed, reversed and reversed. Also, the truth of today can oppose the truth of yesterday. It thus becomes either an elastic dogma that can be interpreted, or an outdated notion that must be discarded. It is a movement of constant ebb and flow in which a thing can be affirmed one day and its exact opposite the next day.
The truth is no longer the correspondence between what is said and what is. She is said. The truth is no longer sought and demonstrated. It is imposed. In the face of power, fact gives way to opinion, coherence to incoherence, constancy to inconstancy, objectivity to subjectivity.
Far from “a hundred wrong” (far from it), it is not by following a tortuous semantic path that we can go in the right direction. Not even the least bad. The real ends up catching up with the narrative.
In the permanent metaverse imposed on us by state propaganda by way of verified and demonstrated information, it is therefore now a set of inverted false truths and assumed lies that monopolize the news. Concomitantly with the modification of the terminology in law of the notion of emergency, a twist of the real has allowed the public authorities to have a management at sight and with variable geometry of the health crisis linked to covid-19. This twist allowed them to impose the following narrative:
- hydroxychloroquine and early treatments do not work;
- experimental therapies must be approved for mass use;
- the precautionary principle consists in injecting children and pregnant women;
- the law must be nationalized;
- the State can substitute shared duties for individual rights;
- the media should no longer play the role of 4th power: they must not go once morest the messages of the Governmentin order not to expose citizens unnecessarily.
All this goes once morest empirical experience, observation.
Thus, in the reasoned plan of the new truth of the metaverse, Gödel’s incompleteness theorem unfortunately takes on its full meaning. In mathematics, the notion of “demonstrability” being relative to a system of axioms, a certain mathematical assertion may very well be demonstrable by one system without being so by another. Also, in the same way that there will always exist true but unprovable mathematical statements without resorting to the right system, in the system of the metaverse, it is possible to assert truths without necessarily demonstrating them.
It becomes Orwellian, except for those who analyze the related plane of real life.
Because those who come up once morest reality find that, in reality:
- early treatments work: numerous studies demonstrate this;
- vaccines have significant side effects and few benefits: they do not prevent contamination, transmission or serious forms of the disease;
- the precautionary principle should prevail over the urgency to inject children;
- the State should be the guarantor of our rights and not impose on us duties that flout our rights;
- the law should be independent of all political considerations;
- the media should be independent and free.
In the best of worlds, the truth should prevail over the lie, the false, this new antinomic truth to the truth, which we see everywhere in the metaverse. It is therefore time to bring common sense back to an orthonormal space, where the axes are independent of each other.
Thus in this orthonormal space with independent dimensions, justice, for example, is truly independent of power, and the state truly acts in the interests of citizens. The norm would then be reason and common sense would serve the common good. It is no longer an organization of dysfunctions imposed artificially by lying to the population for the privileges of certainwhich operates.
Like what, as often (as always?), Proudhon was indeed right, totally right, concerning the principle of mutual insurance*.
*What he called mutualism (System of economic contradictions or philosophy of misery [1846])
In the metaverse, when the reality is quite different, the false would have become the new true, a paradigm established by means of a “scientist illusionism”.
