This Government boasts of having found the definitive solution to that social right to decent housing that the Constitution advocates in its article 47. But it takes impressive cheek for this social problem to be transferred to society itself, when it must be the Public Administration that enables access to decent housing, as a guiding principle of social and economic policy. Has he perhaps forgotten the right to private property in article 33 of the Constitution? What socialists and podemitas intend to do is “undress one saint to dress another.” They have proposed that squatters and delinquent tenants should be protected at the expense of citizens who have a rental home, not to enrich themselves as large owners (which might also be), but to obtain additional income to their little or no pension , or a single income for lack of income of another type. The casuistry in Spain is devastating. And almost everyone is silent resigned. Pedro Sánchez has pulled an ace up his sleeve called vulnerability and according to his super-RDL 21/2021 of October 26, on the extension of social protection measures, it provides that until February 28 the supply of electricity, water and gas to vulnerable consumers. And who pays then? And next, he establishes that until February 28 evictions and evictions will be suspended, taking advantage of the alleged vulnerability of the tenant, further delaying the slow processing of these processes. And not content with this, they dare to pit the vulnerabilities of landlord and tenant once morest each other, to see which of the two weighs more. It is as if the complainant had to prove his innocence (vulnerability) once morest the alleged culprit, that he should be the accused. What nonsense is that? And they call the CGPJ expired? Expired are those who establish a dictatorial and confiscatory regime of properties, which people have acquired by inheritance or with the sweat of their brow paying a mortgage. They want citizens to act as Little Sisters of Charity, assuming a responsibility that belongs only to the State. Even in the Franco dictatorship special priority was given to social housing, but building it, not taking it away from others. These illegal and abusive practices do not occur in any country in Europe. Thus, they strive to urgently process the housing law when it would be better for them to use the urgency to evict squatters and delinquent tenants and return possession to their legitimate owners. And if necessary, proceed to indemnify the owners, which is also contemplated by the Constitution. Legal certainty must be guaranteed and the housing law that they intend to impose is a fertile field of uncertainty and generates mistrust. Ulpiano was right when he said: “Justice consists in living honestly, not harming others and giving each one his own.”
