I’m doing it once more. Tadashi Kakihana (50) thought so in spite of the words he said in the live broadcast.
Veteran singer Mie Nakao (75) will appear live on TOKYO MX “Goji ni muchu!” (Monday-Friday, 5 pm) broadcast on the 21st. There was a scene where a junior singer, Rumiko Koyanagi (69), was beaten up.
In the program of the day, Koyanagi revealed on his blog that he had a New Year’s party with the talents Hiromi (56) and Iyo Matsumoto (56), and was impressed that Hiromi finished the accounting on the spot. He introduced an article that he spelled, “What a man. He is a junior and younger man, but he is a reliable and good man.”
When asked regarding this matter, Nakao suddenly quarreled, “Do you want to post this on your blog?” “This person likes younger people, so I think he’s been able to contribute to younger people. Isn’t it his first experience (to get paid by younger people)?”
Assistant Mitz Mangrove (46) was impressed by this statement, saying, “Yes. It’s refreshing to have Hiromi, who is younger, pay for it. It’s a great point of view.” The problem was Kakihana’s remarks following this.
“I also appeared in” Goji ni muchu “and I still don’t understand the nuances in a year, but the pressure of the staff saying” Please shake (talk) to Mie when talking regarding Rumiko Koyanagi “. There is. Mie-san has a special feeling for Koyanagi-san? For example, I hate it … “, a word like” Goji ni muchu “who has a feud with Koyanagi for some time.
While the guest’s ex- “DA PUMP” YUKINARI (43) also smiled with a bitter smile, “I’m completely inviting you,” Nakao, who got on the invitation water, said, “I don’t like or hate it, it’s a different era, but it’s just. I don’t know how this person is now, but in the old days, he was a child who mightn’t even say hello. ” Mitz laughed so much, saying, “Today was the most harsh episode of Rumiko-san’s episodes over the years.” Kakihana apologized, “I’m sorry. I’m sorry,” but said, “Although I said that, I’m co-starring in this program, too.” Muddy.
Watching this exchange, my memory flashed back to a scene from the show that aired on May 7, last year.
The theme of the show, which decides the theme and votes for the audience each time, was “Have you ever encountered a rip-off?” When asked regarding this, Nakao began to say, “I ate at a hotel yesterday.”
“It was expensive (price), but the manager was a little late … I didn’t have time, so when I asked” Do you want to eat something? “, He said,” It’s okay because I don’t have time. ” But when I said, “Can you give me some water?”, He said, “No, I can’t get water unless I take something.” It’s a first-class hotel! “
Even in this scene eight months ago, Kakihana certainly said, “What’s your name, do you want to say it?” Kakihana, who was afraid of Nakao’s aponeurosis when he said, “You can say it!”, Said, “Mie-san, you have an influence …” I said my real name.
“I don’t drink a glass of water. If I don’t get something, I won’t get any water. After all, I ordered juice, but it’s ridiculous!” At this point, Mitz summed up, “It’s a conflict between a first-class hotel and a first-class star. You may be thinking,’If you’re a first-class star, ask for one item.'”
Internet public opinion was boiled by the “Sports Hochi” WEB article that reported this exchange that lasted regarding three minutes.
Some advocates said, “Mr. Nakao is eating and even if you serve water as a hospitality,” and “I’m asking for juice at the end …”, but most of them said, “Water is free.” It was a criticism of Nakao, such as “It’s strange to demand it as a matter of course” and “I’m misunderstanding because I’m an entertainer.”
Unambiguously, in the context of “rip-off”, suddenly an unpleasant private event is announced. There is no doubt that Nakao, who put the real name of the hotel on the radio waves, has a fault, but I still think that Kakihana’s words, “What’s your name, do you want to say it?” Was a major cause of the uproar.
After that, Kakihana also regretted that the program’s Tuesday commentator writer Hisafumi Iwashita (60) and others continued to warn him on the live broadcast, saying, “You were angry.” After that, I was hiding, but eight months later, on this day, when I saw the same act of fluttering, I honestly thought, “It hasn’t changed.” Of course, we also know how much service spirit the Kakihana’s bloody efforts to liven up the show have.
However, I also had a big question regarding the fact that Nakao and Koyanagi’s disagreement, which he should have known for himself, was regarded as “pressure from the staff.” “That way of saying is wrong.”
As I wrote during the turmoil in May last year, there is a monster called “intolerance” to others in modern society in the corona sword where the exit cannot be seen. Let’s criticize anything. In such an atmosphere, all those who send information must keep in mind the ever-increasing danger of live broadcasting and how careful they are when saying something regarding people. I don’t think it will change at all.
I think it’s MC’s job to correct the trajectory and keep the viewers angry when the performers “runaway” like Nakao this time. Is it really MC’s job to dare to listen to the feelings of likes and dislikes for juniors who have a disagreement for a long time?
Backbiting and slanderous defamation to others while escalating by an anonymous coward. Nobody wants, reads or listens to broadcasts or articles that hurt anyone. Because of the era of intolerance, the sender of information must be careful. It’s not just regarding Kakihana. The words are bouncing back to me as they are. (Reporter column, Kengo Nakamura)
