Ali Hassan Khalil officially responded to Basil’s (Hussein Beydoun) speech
Political aide to the Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament Nabih Berri Deputy Ali Hassan Khalil, today, Monday, with the official “first” response to the speech of the head of the “Free Patriotic Movement” and the son-in-law of the President of the Republic, the representative Gebran BassilAnd that was hours before the expected position of the Secretary-General.HezbollahHassan Nasrallah, who was subjected to the greatest attack on the tongue of his ally, before imposing on him the formula of “Mar Mikhael Understanding” (February 6, 2006) or “Shiite dualism.”
Ali Hassan Khalil responded to the accusations of obstruction and waste of public money at Bassil’s nets. He also directed the “founder of the movement” and President Michel Aoun for being among the warlords (the civil war in Lebanon 1975-1990) or “perhaps theirs” And by displacing half of the Christians in his time, he was also accused of putting Berri laws into jars, stressing that Aoun is the one who delays many of them.
In response to what was considered Bassil’s imposition of the equation of maintaining the understanding with “Hezbollah” in return for disengaging from the “Amal Movement”, Ali Hassan Khalil said, “We are proud of the national duo who assumed the responsibility of defending Lebanon and defending the establishment of the state and its institutions, and we are committed to this consensus. Integration is a protection for the state and its institutions.
He added, “Our belief is deep that without the resistance, there would be no state, and Israel would be in and around the capital, and we did not harness Shiite unity except for the sake of the national interest, and we have no enemy but Israel, and political rivalry was and remains under the roof of the national relationship.”
Yesterday, Sunday, Ali Hassan Khalil proceeded to announce his press conference, with details of the time and place this followingnoon at the headquarters of the “Amal” movement, in Bir Hassan – Beirut, despite the fact that he is a defendant in the Beirut port explosion case and an arrest warrant was issued once morest him In absentia, the discriminatory Public Prosecution had asked the Internal Security Forces to circulate it, and it is assumed that it will come into force with the end of the regular session of Parliament on December 31.
We will hold a press conference, during which we will discuss the general situation, at 12 noon tomorrow, Monday, at the headquarters of the Amal-Bir Hassan movement.
— Ali Hassan Khalil (@alihasankhalil) January 2, 2022
Activists placed Ali Hassan Khalil’s announcement depicting the security forces, considering his move as a flagrant challenge to the state and its services, and to the judicial decisions that disrupted “Hezbollah” and “Amal Movement” (headed by Berri) government sessions with the aim of blowing up and evading the judicial investigator, Judge Tariq Al-Bitar.
Only in Lebanon:
Wanted by justice, with an arrest warrant in absentia for a massacre that killed hundreds of victims, a live press conference is held on the air at a known place and time, and the security services are complicit, criminal and corrupt, and do not move. @LebISF #devices_on_men ؟#mafias_and rulers #clean_mean_all pic.twitter.com/q3khdfPpbh– lucien bourjeily (@lucienbourjeily) January 3, 2022
#Lebanon
Dear @LebISF
A person wanted for justice will be holding a press conference at 12 at the headquarters of Amal Movement, Bir Hassan
An arrest warrant has been issued earlier once morest him & those responsible of the #BeirutBlast that killed 229 innocent lives#ManOfGoodWill pic.twitter.com/kYH0YFKAmk– Rula El Halabi (@Rulaelhalabi) January 3, 2022
A live press conference for a person once morest whom an arrest warrant was issued is an explicit declaration that someone wants to rule by force and impose their own justice without caring what others think. Such behavior is only done by the mafia.
— Nizar SAGHIEH (@nsaghieh) January 3, 2022
Shadow Chief
Ali Hassan Khalil addressed Bassil, who he considers the “shadow president” of Lebanon and “the waste of Christian rights in black boxes”, by saying, “The statement that we were not left with electricity and Deir Ammar is rejected. You wanted to pass the theft of 50 million dollars and know that you were exposed in the cabinet and the records present”.
Yesterday, on Sunday, Bassil fired multi-directional arrows, most of them once morest his ally, “Hezbollah”, knowing that he played on the rope of positions between those that “torn” the understanding paper signed on February 6, 2006, and those that confirm its adherence to it on the condition of developing the document that He winked at the party’s lack of commitment to basic provisions in it, most notably state-building, in order to cover corruption and remain silent regarding it, in connection with its dualism with the “Amal Movement”.
Bassil was keen to repeat the scenario of his being subjected to political assassination and the costs he incurred politically and popularly and within the rules of his current, and also by the Americans through the sanctions that affected him, all as a result of his understanding with “Hezbollah” and his coverage of it, which was preceded by the latter’s dualism with the “Amal Movement” that Bassil waved That it became the decision in the understanding rather than the party.
Basil, who hinted at the possibility of visiting Syria through the Syrian refugee file portal, said: “Our priority is the state and its reform. Their priority is the resistance and its defense. We said that both can be preserved, but the resistance remains under the state and not above it. The state cannot be lost for the sake of the resistance, but it can be Let’s win both.”
Nasrallah’s word
Attention is drawn this evening to Nasrallah’s speech on the second anniversary of the killing of the commander of the “Quds Force” in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Qassem Soleimani, and the deputy head of the “Popular Mobilization Authority” Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, in an American air strike near Baghdad International Airport in early 2020, especially After explicit accusations by Aoun and Bassil of him disrupting cabinet sessions on the side of the “Amal Movement”.
Follow-up circles suggested that Nasrallah would respond to Aoun’s speech first, which he addressed to the Lebanese last Monday, in which he put the defense strategy and “Hezbollah’s weapons” on the dialogue table. Amal movement, which cannot be put into any equation.
