2023-10-04 20:48:00
“mafia torture method” y “ritual of man-eating tribes“are some of the terms used by the judges of Oral Court No. 8, Javier Anzoategui y Luis Maria Rizzi, regarding the case of the legal interruption of pregnancy of a girl who was raped, while they also gave a pejorative opinion regarding gender violence. This Wednesday, the Council of the Judiciary sanctioned them with the discount of the 50% of your salary due to the misogynistic content of some of its rulings.
The decision was made in the plenary session of the Council. The sanction once morest Anzoátegui was approved with 18 votes and the dissent of the lawyer representing Together for Change Jimena de la Torre and Rizzi’s addedIn addition, the negative vote of judges Diego Barroetaveña and Agustina Díaz Cordero.
Judicial Council: two employees accused of being part of a gang of kidnappers are suspended
Thus, it was determined that the money that will be deducted, one time only, from both magistrates will be allocated “as reparation” to one of the victims of his actions. “The judges’ expressions were offensive to the victim and to her mother and the professionals who accompanied her. “The victims must be treated in a respectful, humane manner and not re-victimizing them,” said the radical senator. Eduardo Vischiwho prepared the approved opinion.
On the other hand, both magistrates were required to comply with the so-called “Micaela Law”sanctioned in 2018, which requires “mandatory training on the subject of gender and violence once morest women for all people who work in the public function at all levels and hierarchies.
Regarding this reason, the resolution explains: “for the purposes of ensuring due update on gender perspective.”
“It is necessary to highlight that today’s sanction is compliance with the principles and values established by the Constitution and international treaties,” added Senator Vischi. Meanwhile, he stated: “Although the fine is symbolic, we must highlight the paradigm shift what this means.”
The content of the errors
In rulings issued since 2020, both judges described the legal interruption of pregnancy as a “mafia torture method”, defining it as “ritual of man-eating tribes” and they gave a pejorative opinion regarding “gender violence.”
The judges also stated, when justifying a conviction once morest a man who had murdered a woman, that the application of the figure of femicide because they considered that the expression ““gender violence” contains a concept “ungraspable” and “obscure.”
In a ruling handed down in 2020, the Court decided to sentence a man to 35 years in prison for simple homicide in royal contest with sexual abuse with carnal access a 13-year-old girl -her stepsister-through violence and threats, and aggravated by having been committed by a brother, with weapons and repeatedly.
Drug trafficking: the Judicial Council delivered state-of-the-art computers in Rosario
There, they asked to investigate the doctors for performing a legal abortion on the victim, and described them as “hitmen and hired killers”.
The Council also evaluated the way in which both identified a trans woman with terms like “the accused” or “the accused with homosexual tendencies.” The Court had also called “manual of inhuman savages” to the Protocol for the Comprehensive Care of People with the Right to Legal Interruption of Pregnancy.
Vischi’s position was supported by the president of the Council, Horacio Rosatti; the judges Alberto Lugones and Alejandra Provítola; the legislators Alvaro Gonzalez, Roxana Reyes, Vanesa Siley, Rodolfo Tailhade, Maria Ines Pilatti and Mariano Recalde, the representative of the Executive Branch, Geronimo Ustarroz; and the lawyers Miguel Piedecasas, Fernanda Vázquez and Héctor Recaldeand academics Hugo Galderisi and William Tamarit.
FP / Give
1696452667
#judges #sanctioned #misogyny #rulings
