The 190 million pound reference has entered the final stage, the accountability court has provided a 342 question paper to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf founder chairman Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi.
Accountability Court judge Nasir Javed Rana held a hearing on the 190 million pound reference in Adiala Jail, founder PTI was presented in the courtroom while Bushra Bibi was also present for the appearance.
NAB Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi and Amjad Parvez appeared along with the team while PTI founder and Bushra Bibi’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar were also present in the court.
The 190 million pound reference has entered the final stage, but the accountability court has provided 342 question papers to Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi.
190 million pound case: Accountability court directed to re-decide on Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi’s acquittal pleas
In the questionnaire, former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi have been asked 79 questions related to the 190 million pound reference.
The question paper was received by their lawyer Salman Safdar in the presence of PTI founder Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi.
Answers to question paper 342 on behalf of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi will be submitted in the court on November 11.
Later, the Islamabad Accountability Court adjourned the hearing on the £190 million reference against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi till November 11.
It should be noted that on November 6, the £190 million reference against Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi entered the final stage, where lawyers Safai had completed cross-examination of 35 witnesses.
What is the statement of 342?
Under Section 342 of the Criminal Code, the accused are heard from their stand.
According to Jung’s report, the accused can say something in his defense on the occasion given by the court, it is also called statement of 342.
Aaj News reported with reference to legal expert Waqas Abriz that while recording the statement of the accused under Section 342 (z) (f), the court itself asks questions to the accused and he answers these questions.
Background of the case
It should be noted that in the 190 million pounds or Al-Qadir Trust case, it is alleged that Imran Khan and his wife sent 50 billion pounds to the government of Pakistan from the British National Crime Agency (NCA) during the PTI regime. In return for giving legal status to Rs., got billions of rupees and hundreds of kanals worth of land from Bahria Town Limited.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
The case relates to the alleged illegal acquisition and construction of land for Al-Qader University, which involved a £140 million money laundering case against Malik Riaz and his family by the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA). Unlawful gain was obtained in recovery.
Imran Khan is also alleged to have misled the cabinet by concealing the facts regarding the settlement agreement, the amount (£140 million) was received under the settlement agreement and was to be deposited in the national exchequer. But it was adjusted to recover Rs 450 billion dues of Bahria Town Karachi.
#million #pounds #reference #Imran #Khan #Bushra #Bibis #statement #record #questionnaire #Pakistan
**Interview with Legal Expert Waqas Abriz on the Al-Qadir Trust Case**
**Interviewer:** Good afternoon, Waqas. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the ongoing Al-Qadir Trust case involving Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi.
**Waqas Abriz:** Good afternoon! It’s my pleasure to be here.
**Interviewer:** The case has recently entered a critical phase, with the accountability court providing a 342-question paper to Imran Khan and his wife. Can you shed some light on what this involves?
**Waqas Abriz:** Certainly. The 342-question paper is part of the process under Section 342 of the Criminal Code. This section allows the accused to present their side of the story. Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi have been asked to respond to specific queries concerning the £190 million reference against them. The responses will play a key role in the court’s assessment.
**Interviewer:** It was reported that there were 79 direct questions related to the case. What kind of questions do you think they might be dealing with?
**Waqas Abriz:** The questions likely revolve around the financial aspects of the case. They could include inquiries about the source of the funds, any alleged misappropriation, and whether the accused can substantiate their claims regarding the management of said funds. Essentially, the court is seeking clarity on their defense.
**Interviewer:** The court session took place in Adiala Jail, where both Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi were present. How does being held at a detention facility impact such legal proceedings?
**Waqas Abriz:** Holding court sessions in a detention facility is not uncommon in high-profile cases. It reflects the security and logistical considerations involved. However, it also raises concerns about the perception of justice. Transparency and fairness in such proceedings are paramount, and ensuring an equitable defense is crucial, even in a jail setting.
**Interviewer:** After the court hearing, it was mentioned that the answers to the questionnaire would be submitted by November 11. How critical will this timeframe be?
**Waqas Abriz:** The timeframe is indeed critical. The responses will provide the court with necessary information that could influence the outcome of the case. Delays in submissions or procedural issues could affect the momentum of the trial. It’s a pivotal moment for both defense teams and the prosecution.
**Interviewer:** what are the possible implications if the court finds Imran Khan and his wife guilty in this case?
**Waqas Abriz:** If found guilty, the implications could be severe, ranging from serious penalties to potential disqualification from holding public office. This case is not only significant legally but also politically, as it has wider ramifications for the PTI party and the political landscape of Pakistan.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Waqas, for your insights on this complex legal situation. We look forward to following the developments closely as they unfold.
**Waqas Abriz:** Thank you for having me. It’s an important case, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss it.
