The ’50s actress case’ has a reversal ending in just one day. Businesswoman A in her 50s, who held a press conference and vowed to reveal her injustice, canceled a meeting with her reporters a few hours before the press conference.
The ending of a lawsuit once morest an actress in her 50s for the pretext of marriage and a lawsuit once morest special threats, which turned the entertainment industry upside down, was absurd.
Prior to the press conference, businessman A said in a statement, “Everything that has been reported in the past is due to my greed for business.” He said, “I offered to recruit an actress I met at the golf course by establishing an entertainment company, but I gave generous support both physically and mentally, but due to COVID-19. As the damage came, we informed him that it was impossible to join our company. I was plunged into a dilemma, and the foolish thought that I should get my money back regardless of the actress’s intentions made the actress’s reputation tarnished.”
The curious thing is that Mr. A told reporters on the 21st, the day before the press conference, in very small details regarding what happened with the actress. Even at the time, she expressed the opinion that she would like to receive monetary compensation, but the cause that Mr. A put forward was ‘love’. Mr. A said that she ‘shared some pretty deep feelings with an actress in her fifties, and this point will be undeniable by the other party,’ she said to herself.
However, in just one day, Mr. A admitted to himself that the purpose of exposing the actress in her 50s was not to appeal for personal feelings or injustice, but to make up for financial loss. If the reason for exposing the actress in her 50s to such a high level over two weeks was for financial reasons, it can only be seen that Mr. A caused a situation in which he had no choice but to take legal punishment and responsibility.
The actress in her 50s emphasized that Mr. A’s claim was not true. He said, “The family was very hard on this because they constantly demanded money through stalking and intimidation.” He said, “There was no support for luxury gifts, living expenses, and education expenses. Rather, I just lent money.”
In addition, the actress in her 50s said that legal action once morest Mr. A is in progress. The charges include attempted blackmail, false accusation, defamation, violation of the Stalking Punishment Act, and attempted fraudulent litigation. He added, “I have no intention of dropping the complaint, and I did not receive an apology directly.” “I felt like my blood was drying out from depression and insomnia. We will take strong legal action, and I hope there are no more victims.”
In this regard, I contacted Mr. A to inquire regarding the facts, but there was no reply.
(SBS Entertainment News reporter Kang Kyung-yoon)
