“Minju, are you confident enough to ask for an apology from the former president of the Wen government?”
President Yu was included in the case of the Wen government’s ‘non-adoption of the report and forced appointment’
People’s Power counterattacked on the 6th when the Yoon Seok-yeol administration’s succession of insolvent personnel disputes centered on the opposition party arose, saying, “How was the Moon Jae-in administration’s ministerial appointments?”
It is interpreted as the logic of whether the Democratic Party of Korea has the right to point out the poor personnel management of the current passport while pointing out the problems with the personnel management of high-ranking officials under the Moon Jae-in regime.
The day before, when President Yoon Seok-yeol was asked a question regarding personnel affairs at Doorstepping, he said, “Then, among the ministers nominated by the previous administration, have you seen such a great person?”
Floor leader Kwon Seong-dong appeared on KBS radio that day and covered the criticism of President Yoon’s remarks, “Have you seen a great person among the former government ministers?” “(President Yoon) was talking to the Democratic Party.”
Referring to former Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Kim Hyun-ji and policy chief Jang Ha-seong, appointed by the Moon Jae-in government, floor leader Kwon said, “Look at the faces of the ministers appointed by former President Moon. a lot,” he said.
He added, “I’m saying this as an appeal to people to know the essential difference from those hired by the Democratic Party.”
Kwon said, “Even the president is trying to find the perfect person, but the more you look, the less (there) there is.
If the ability and professionalism are excellent, some flaws are found in terms of morality, so I am struggling very much and (President Yoon) complained to me that it is difficult to find people.”
People’s Power, in particular, reacted fiercely to Democratic Party floor leader Park Hong-geun’s mention of President Yoon’s apology to the public.
In a commentary, spokesperson Park Hyung-soo of the floor said, “The Democratic Party should not criticize the Yoon Seok-yeol administration without understanding the personnel principles and look back on itself.” Does the Democratic Party have confidence in personnel management?” he said.
After discussing the ‘five principles of personnel management’ that former President Moon promised during his presidential campaign, floor spokesperson Park said, “A total of 16 of the 22 prime ministers and ministerial-level personnel who are subject to personnel hearings in the first cabinet of the Moon Jae-in administration are ‘five principles’. It was controversial in more than one of them.”
“Since then, the Moon Jae-in government has announced the ‘Seven Great Personnel Principles’, including sexual offenses and drunk driving,” said the spokesperson for the House of Representatives, Park. .
“Is it really fair to deprive me of even an opportunity to demonstrate my abilities and expertise just because there was a mistake a long time ago? Wouldn’t it be appropriate to give
In addition to these comments, floor spokesperson Park also published two reference materials pointing out the personnel problems of the Moon Jae-in administration.
It was a 13-page reference document that summarizes cases where the Moon Jae-in government failed to meet the ‘7 personnel standards’ and a 4-page reference document that summarizes cases where the appointment of former President Moon Jae-in was forced without the adoption of the hearing review progress report.
In the data, cases such as evasion of military service, tax evasion, illegal property propagation, transfer of disguise, research misconduct, drunk driving, and sex-related crimes once morest senior government officials such as Lee Nak-yeon, Jeong Sye-kyun, and former Prime Minister Kim Bu-gyeom were detailed. .
Despite these poor personnel, there are a total of 25 cases in which former President Moon forced the appointment following the National Assembly did not adopt the hearing review report, and the total number of cases in which the Democratic Party handled the hearing review progress report and then forced the appointment. 13 cases were counted, the People’s Power said.
The reference materials also included President Yoon and Rep. Choi Jae-hyung, who were subject to verification, respectively, as the Prosecutor General of the Moon Jae-in administration and the Chief of the Board of Audit and Inspection.
The People’s Power classified President Yoon’s case as a case in which the appointment was forced because the report was not adopted.
Regarding Rep. Choi, following stating that it was a case in which the personnel standards were not met due to ‘illegal property growth’ and ‘disguised transfer’, he said, “There are suspicions that it is not for speculative purposes by actually purchasing land whose official land price is very cheap at several dozen times. “In addition, for the convenience of commuting to school for children who are planning to go to middle school in 1994 and 1995,[Rep. Choi]has approved two disguise transfers from Seongbuk-gu to Jongno-gu, Seoul,” he added.
However, the reference materials did not include whether or not President Yoon did not meet the personnel standards at the time of the prosecutor general’s verification.
/yunhap news
